Should a Lawyer who is a Freemason be forced by law to declare an interest in certain cirstances?

Every Freemason has undertaken sworn oath on his/her life to help and protect Brethren and Fraternity, period. This is bound to have effect on their ability to give their all in the best interest of their client in all cirstances, and/or their ability attack another identifiable brother Freemason in opposition to their "profane" client (profane means unlearned and is what freemasons call none masons) with such vigour that might hurt or destroy him/her, as is sometimes necessary to win a case outright. Indeed if the opposition should happen to be his lodge master he is literally to be treated almost as, if not equal to God. It is arguable that the lodge master would never place a solicitor in that situation, but should it be in their hand to decide?